| ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
|
| Year : 2023 | Volume
: 15
| Issue : 1 | Page : 43-51 |
|
|
Evaluation of shade matching of monochromatic versus polychromatic layering techniques in restoration of fractured incisal angle of maxillary incisors: A randomized controlled trial
Basma Badry Hashem, Mohammed Adel Khairy, Omar Osama Shaalan
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Omar Osama Shaalan
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 35 Mohamad Farid Street El Hay El Motamayz, Sixth of October City, Giza
Egypt
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_176_22
|
|
|
Aim: To evaluate shade matching potential of monochromatic layering technique (Filtek Universal) compared to polychromatic layering technique (Filtek Z350XT) in restoration of fractured incisal angle. Materials and Methods: A total of 26 patients received 26 class IV restorations divided randomly between groups (n = 13) using either; monochromatic layering technique (Filtek Universal) or polychromatic layering technique (Filtek Z350XT) in a parallel study design with superiority framework. After preparation, class IV resin composite restorations were performed according to manufacturers’ instructions. Shade matching of class IV restorations was evaluated by two blinded and calibrated assessors using the modified USPHS criteria and digital photography at baseline and after three-days. Association between the layering technique for restoration of fractured incisal angle and shade matching potential was done using the chi square test; statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: Inter-group comparison between layering techniques for shade matching using the modified USPHS criteria have shown statistically significant difference at baseline (P = 0.0001), while there was no statistically significant difference after 3 days (P = 0.2864). Intra-group comparison between follow-up periods within monochromatic layering technique have revealed statistically significant difference (P = 0.0001), while within polychromatic layering technique there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.2864). Inter-group comparison between both layering techniques using digital photography have shown no statistically significant difference at baseline (P = 0.3592), while after 3 days there was statistically significant difference (P = 0.0071). Intra-group comparison between follow-up periods within monochromatic layering technique have shown statistically significant difference (P = 0.0002), while within polychromatic layering techniquethere was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.3592). Conclusions:Monochromatic resin composite restorations showed satisfactory shade matching potential when compared to polychromatic resin composite restorations. |
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
