| ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
|
| Year : 2022 | Volume
: 14
| Issue : 5 | Page : 462-467 |
|
|
Comparison of tensile and shear bond strengths of layering porcelain with VITA Suprinity after different surface treatment methods: An in vitro study
Arash Shishehian1, Farnoush Fotovat1, Banafsheh Poormoradi2, Sara Khazaei1, Maryam Farhadian3, Hirbod Gilandoust4
1 Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2 Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4 School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Farnoush Fotovat
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan
Iran
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_75_22
|
|
|
Background: For all-ceramic restorations to last a long time, the ceramic veneering and substructure need to have a strong sufficient bond. This research compared how two different surface treatments affected the tensile and shear bond strengths of zirconium-reinforced lithium silicate and porcelain (Suprinity). Materials and Methods: A total of 120 samples were divided into three groups at random: control(no surface treatment),aluminium oxide sandblasting, Erbium, Chromium-doped Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, and Garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser irradiation, and 60 samples to evaluate tensile bond strength and 60 samples to evaluate shear bond strength. By using one-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Tukey’s test, the tensile and shear bond strength between Suprinity and porcelain (VITA VM 11) was analyzed in all groups. Results: The maximum and minimum tensile bond strength was seen in sandblasting group (7.86 ± 2.22 Mpa) and control group (4.88 ± 1.58 Mpa), respectively (P < 0.001). The amount of shear bond strength in the laser group, sandblast group, and control group was (5.16 ± 1.66 Mpa),(5.00 ± 1.34 Mpa),(4.39 ± 1.54 Mpa) respectively (P = 0.252). In tensile and shear bond strength tests, most failures were cohesive in VITA VM 11 layering porcelain (65.0% vs. 66.7%) followed by mixed failures (33.3% vs. 20%). Conclusion: Suprinity and layering porcelain produced higher tensile bonds as a result of Al2O3 sandblasting and Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation. While no pure adhesive failure was seen, cohesive failure was predominant. |
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
