JIOH on LinkedIn JIOH on Facebook
  • Users Online: 277
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 243-253

Evaluation of the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in the acceleration of canine retraction: A randomized controlled trial


Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Eyad Alomari
35 Wrentham Rd, Worcester, MA 01602
Syria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_330_21

Rights and Permissions

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of the intra-ligament injection of platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on canine movement rate during its orthodontic retraction. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial with a split-mouth design included 40 patients (21.3 ± 1.8 years) whose all first premolars were indicated for extraction. Twenty patients were randomly allocated to each group (PRP vs. i-PRF). The Canine retraction was performed using Ricketts spring. PRP and i-PRF were injected twice in the intervention side with a 21-day interval. Saline was used likewise in the control side. Canine movement, rotation, and molar anchorage loss were measured on dental casts, whereas canine inclination was studied on cephalograms. Shapiro–Wilk normality test was performed, and a paired t-test was subsequently used for comparison within the same group. In addition, a two-sample t-test was used to compare the two groups. Results: A significantly higher rate of canine movement was observed in the PRP intervention group during the first month, unlike the i-PRF group in comparison with the control side. Besides, canine retracting rate was higher in the PRP group during the third month than in the i-PRF group. No statistical differences in canine inclination, rotation, and molar anchorage loss were found except for mandibular canine rotation in the PRP group and maxillary canine rotation between the two groups. Conclusion: PRP injection was probably better than the i-PRF in accelerating canine movement without avoiding the unwanted effects.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed256    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded34    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal