Management of infraorbital rim and orbital floor fractures: A comparison of subciliary and infraorbital approaches
Mohammed Ahtesam Aleem1, Fazil Arshad Nasyam2, KR Parameshwar Reddy3, Tanveer Karpe4, Tejpal Singh5, Achunala Bhavani Shailaja6
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sparkle Dental Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, Telangana 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Malla Reddy Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India 4 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, S. B. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Bidar, Karnataka, India 5 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nanded Rural Dental College and Hospital, Nanded, Maharashtra, India 6 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jayalakshmi Dental Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Correspondence Address:
Mohammed Ahtesam Aleem Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sparkle Dental Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana Telangana
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_26_17
|
Background: Selection of approach to treat orbital fractures involves multiple factors such as visibility and esthetics. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare subciliary and infraorbital incisions for orbital floor and infraorbital rim fractures. Materials and Methods: We carried our study in twenty patients, who reported to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery with orbital floor and infraorbital rim fractures. The patients were divided into two groups (Group A - subciliary incision and Group B - infraorbital incision), with ten patients in each group. We compared infraorbital and subciliary incisions to approach the infraorbital rim and orbital floor in orbital fractures using criteria such as exposure time, esthetics, and complications. Results: All the analysis was done using SPSS version 14.P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We found that infraorbital incision took shortest time for exposing fractured site, caused more edema after 1 month of procedure, and lead to more visible scarring when compared to subciliary incision. Conclusion: We recommend subciliary incision to approach the infraorbital rim and orbital floor fractures.
|