JIOH on LinkedIn JIOH on Facebook
  • Users Online: 629
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 937-942

Dimensions of the Interproximal Gingival Papilla in the Upper Anterior Areas Rehabilitated with Different types of Unitary Implants


1 Master, Department of Dental Prosthesis, São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School - Campinas, São Paulo - Brazil
2 Student of the Graduate Program, Master in Dental Prosthesis, Department of Prosthodontics, São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School, Campinas - São Paulo - Brazil
3 Master, Department of Endodontics, Itaúna University, Itaúna, MG - Brazil
4 Coordinator and Adjunct Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School, Campinas - São Paulo - Brazil

Correspondence Address:
Simone Kreve
Rua Independência 1899, Apto 602, Centro, Toledo, Paraná -Brazil

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: This study compares the gingival papillary in areas restored with external hexagon and Morse taper implants and in healthy natural dentition. The distance from the bone crest (BC) to the contact point (CP) and the distance from the implant platform to the axial wall of the adjacent tooth influenced the papillary extension. Materials and Methods: Jemt's index (1997) was used to the gingival papillae in 4 height levels: 0 - absent papilla; - papilla occupies less than half the distance from its base to the CP; 2 - papilla occupies more than half this distance but not the entire interproximal space; 3 - interproximal space completely occupied. The sample consisted of 27 proximal areas between natural teeth, 25 proximal areas to external hexagons, and proximal areas to Morse taper. Patients were clinically evaluated to assess presence - total or partial - or absence of the gingival papilla. Radiographies were taken with the adaptation of metallic millimetric meshes for the measurements. Results: Regarding papillary height scores, no significant difference observed between groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Group 3 - rehabilitated with Morse taper implants - had better index of papillary fill and the larger the distance between the to the BC, the smaller the papillary score. Further research with larger sample size is of paramount importance.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1207    
    Printed23    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded73    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal