JIOH on LinkedIn JIOH on Facebook
  • Users Online: 40
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 227-231

Comparison of the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Primary Molars Restored with Various Tooth Bonded Restorative Material: An In Vitro Study


1 Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedodontics, Mamata Dental College, Telangana, India
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Dental Science, SOA University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
3 Reader, Department of Pedodontics, KLR's Institute of Dental Science, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
4 Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedodontics, Mamata Dental College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
5 Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedodontics, Pananeya Dental College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Correspondence Address:
Snigdha Pattanaik
Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Dental Science, SOA University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: This study evaluates the fracture resistance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with Cermet, Resin modified glass-ionomer cement (GIC), and nanocomposites. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 primary first and second molars were collected for this study. All the teeth were randomly divided into three groups (N = 20). Standard pulpotomy cavities were prepared. Teeth were air dried and the canal orifices were capped with a layer of zinc oxide eugenol. A lining of calcium hydroxide was placed over it. Cermet, Resin Modified GIC, and nanocomposite were placed in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. All the samples were then subjected to fracture strength test using the universal testing machine, and the results were statistically analyzed. Results: All the groups were compared by ANOVA one-way test which indicated that there were statistically significant differences among the three groups with P < 0.05. Conclusion: Nanocomposites can be considered to be a best restorative material in terms of fracture strength among Cermet and Resin modified GIC.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2539    
    Printed52    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded158    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal