JIOH on LinkedIn JIOH on Facebook
  • Users Online: 89
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 153-157

One-year Clinical Evaluation of a New Bleaching Product Used with and without Light


1 Associate Professor, Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, Lebanon
2 Clinical Instructor, Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, Lebanon
3 Chairperson, Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, Lebanon

Correspondence Address:
Joseph Sabbagh
Associate Professor, Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, Lebanon

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: This in-vivo study compares the outcome of vital teeth bleaching, with and without light. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 subjects were selected based on an exclusion and inclusion criteria with a minimum shade of A2 (classical Vitapan shade guide and electronic easy shade). The subjects were split into two groups. Group 1: One session of in-office bleaching using 30% hydrogen peroxide, without light. Group 2: In-office bleaching using 30% hydrogen peroxide with light. Both groups were given prefabricated home bleaching disposable trays containing 8% hydrogen peroxide to be used for 3 days. A color stability was evaluated during a period of 1-year, at baseline initially before bleaching (T0), at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T6), and 12 months (T12). Subjects were given a sensitivity log sheet to report any sensitivity during treatment. Different statistical tests, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney were used to analyze the results. Results: Teeth bleached appeared lighter when compared to baseline with and without light while when comparing the use of light to no light, no significant difference was registered. Conclusion: The use of light is not mandatory for the success of in-office bleaching.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2172    
    Printed31    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded109    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal